Talk:Barrett v. United States

Excluding testimony
The case summary at Quimbee says that the case hinged on whether the court erred in excluding testimony by witness James Melvin, who stated that Barrett was not involved in the crime. If so, this should be included; but I'm not confident enough in the facts of the case to know how to incorporate this. – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a different Barrett v. United States from 1976, not the 1894 case that is the subject of this article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow. Oops! Okay, nevermind. – Quadell (talk) 13:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Barrett v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119214004/http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/usdc_sc_leg to http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/usdc_sc_leg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)