Talk:Bart the Lover/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cptnono (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I judged this article based on the criteria and other FAs under the topic. It meets all GA requirements. Prose are good (improvement could always be made), media is handled, it is thorough, no dab links, and no dead links.

Changes made: Alterations to these changes would not prevent this from being GA. Note: Cptnono (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Edna and Mrs. K changed to Mrs. Krabappel. Mrs. seems OK here since it is the character's name.
 * Adjusted a few refs to show ISO dates instead of being spelled out.
 * Adjusted line about the wind (I almost put it on hold for this but that seemed to not be necessary). That line might come across vague to someone who has not seen the episode. Adjusted it to mention that it was "poetic" instead.
 * non breaking space on numbers.
 * Only Ernest wikilinked in Ernest Needs A Kidney since it came across misleading.
 * The Plot subseciton is unreferenced as some of the other better articles under the project are. I believe this should be addressed at a project level. The info is verifiable but there are options to make it slightly more wikified.
 * Thanks for the review! Plot sections actually don't require references per WP:MOSTV. The episode itself is used as the source.  The left orium  10:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)