Talk:Bartok (compiler)

OCJ/AOT/IL2CPU
These should really be added here. Moitoius (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. They do not provide any information about Bartok. Linking them would only be for the sake of discoverability and navigation (I am assuming that would not be for advertising). The see also section is not a navigational device, but rather to link to related topics.

The categories are there as the navigational tools. Put them all in the same category to make them navigable for one another. Navboxes can also be used; they are also valid navigational devices. But since a proliferation of navboxes is to be avoided, categories are best suited for navigational aid. --soum talk 16:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Isn't Bartok actually AOT compiler? It generally performs verification of bytecode (not C#, or Sign#) and then global optimalisations (like class compacting, removing unused methods, inlineing indirect callls adding explicit memory managment) and finnally generates native code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.213.255.7 (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bartok (compiler). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060406184534/http://research.microsoft.com:80/act/ to http://research.microsoft.com/act/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)