Talk:Bassetki

Merger proposal

 * Weak oppose Site and village share a name, but they're not the same. I would just move all the archaeology stuff to Mardaman and either mention its existence in the text of the village, or put the site in a See also section. Articles that try to merge information about an archaeological site and a modern settlement tend to become messy so in my opinion it's better to keep them separated. Best, Zoeperkoe (talk) 06:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Reasonable. I was motivated after watching the OI video on the Bassketi excavations and noticed that these two articles had a lot of overlap, but yeah, just maybe moving some stuff between them makes more sense.Ploversegg (talk) 14:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Our normal practice is to maintain separate articles on archaeological sites and the modern places they're in or near to, since sources rarely address them together and the content of the articles tends to be structured very differently. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Well then, I will rm the merger prop and maybe move a few things bet the articles.Ploversegg (talk) 15:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)