Talk:Bateshwar Hindu temples, Madhya Pradesh

Original research?
Nice expansion of an interesting site. But "The site has been a confused assemblage of ruins with randomly mixed temple parts, and there is no evidence that the original temples looked like the newly re-assembled temples from the ruins." doesn't really seem justified by the source. The stones were no doubt lying where they had fallen, which is not "randomly mixed", and the article emphasizes the use of Sanscrit texts, and it's clear from the "before" photo that some temples remained essentially intact. Johnbod (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks. No, not quite. That para should have additional sources, somehow I missed it. I will go back to the sources, recheck and clarify. Give me a week or so (or I welcome you and others to please feel free to check the sources on this site and revise the article). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)