Talk:Batman: Arkham City/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JDC808 (talk · contribs) 22:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I'm JDC808 and I will be reviewing this article. I would like to make note that this is my first time reviewing an article for GA, but I have made several articles GA and one FA. I will begin the review within the next 24 hours. -- JDC808  ♫  22:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Outside comment

As the Wii U version of the game has yet to be released and it will have additional features, will receive reviews and coverage, I may be leaning to say that this nomination would not meet the criterion 3a and 3b. But that is just an outside comment. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  09:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you've seen the trailer for the WiiU version of the game, you will see that existing features with tacked on multi-screen, is not going to tax the article. And review wise, it's already been released on multiple formats, the WiiU does not require substantial specialist coverage. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh well thanks for clarifying this for me. Although it was just a comment :P — Ṟ  Ṉ™  19:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't believe the little extra info is gonna cause the article to fail. It's not really new info, albeit the couple of small tack ons (which the article may already cover - I haven't gotten through the article all the way yet). Though I willl say a couple or so reviews should be added for the Wii U version as well as their Metacritic and GameRankings scores. -- JDC808  ♫  19:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, at GA comprehensiveness needs to be broad but not necessarily exhaustive, but at FA, the Wii U stuff would be necessary. As is, the coverage is nice and wide but there is an identifiable gap to be plugged if this wants a bronze star. GRAPPLE   X  19:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll include the stuff as it comes but I don't see it requiring more than a subsection at the bottom of the gameplay section and no more than a paragraph in the critcal reception unless for some reason there is a drastically different reaction, it's little more than a DLC download beyond appearing on another console. So it shouldn't hamper a move to GA. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Verdict
Great work. -- JDC808  ♫  23:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Woop Woop. Thanks for the time and attention you've put in to this JDC808. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. You've put great time into making this a good article. -- JDC808  ♫  23:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)