Talk:Batman & Robin (film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Lead
 * I'm a bit confused by the lead. Although I know that the film is part of a series, it doesn't say as such until the second sentence, after it has says "Chris O'Donnell returning" and "introducing Batgirl".


 * Plot
 * I'd suggest wikilinking Gotham.
 * Bat-Signal and Bat-signal. Which is correct? Also no need to link twice.


 * Cast
 * "However, Batman is facing an argument with Robin feeling he can take on villains without him." There should be a comma between Robin and feeling. However it might need rewording anyway. Who feels he can take on villains alone? Batman or Robin?
 * Is MacGregor's Syndrome a fictional disease?


 * Development
 * Are the links to February 1996 and March 1996 necessary?
 * There's several use of brackets. I'm not a big fan of brackets, if the text is vital then I feel it's better without brackets.


 * Box office
 * "In contrast, The Lost World grossed over $600 million globally." Do you have a reference for this?


 * Legacy
 * What happened to Clooney's three-film contract?


 * References
 * The first link isn't formatted correctly?
 * Should it been done in two columns rather than three?


 * General
 * There seems to be a lot of repeated wikilinks.
 * Are there any more appropriate images?

A bit to do, so I'll put it on hold for now. Peanut4 (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * All done. There aren't any appropriate images, beyond perhaps free photos of the actors, but they aren't really appropriate for this film article. Gary King ( talk ) 03:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The plot says McGregor's Syndrome, the cast says MacGregor's Syndrome. Which is correct? Secondly is this a real or fictional disease? Everything else looks alright. If there any images which might be in the slightest bit appropriate, it might be worth considering adding them because it's a lot of text to work through. Peanut4 (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The latter spelling is correct; the former has been fixed. It is a fictional disease. I've added an image of Clooney as he plays an important role in this film, and I have added the image to the paragraph that discusses when he was hired. Gary King ( talk ) 16:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

All looks good now. I've added a note to clarify the disease is a fictional one, in the cast section. Obviously it would be nice to find some more appropriate images. But all round, good work. Peanut4 (talk) 16:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)