Talk:Batted ball/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments
There's little to mention on this simple and clear article, which is fully cited.


 * Maybe wikilink trajectory.
 * Done


 * "an arcing trajectory": aren't all trajectories arcing parabolas? (It was a long time ago that I did school physics). Perhaps say "high-flying" or "that arc high in the sky" or something of that sort.
 * Changed to "hit in an arcing manner"


 * Why is "foul tip" both linked and in boldface? I thought we did one or the other.
 * Fixed


 * The bunt rule seems to be very old. I know there's another article on bunt, but perhaps a sentence based on Snyder would be useful here on why bunts are treated differently?
 * Additional sentence added, does that help any?

I've responded to all of your points to date. Hog Farm (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, to be honest I think that's about it. It's properly structured and cited so I guess it's a GA. Good work! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)