Talk:Battle Ground Lake State Park

in-line citations
Is it really necessary to have this tag on an article without contentious claims? Murderbike 23:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If there is more than one reference it is nice to know from which source each of the facts is referecenced. If there are no footnotes then it requires checking all of the sources. This is a personal preference on my part, but I don't think the decision should be based on whether the anything is contentious in the article. --Burntnickel 00:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Camping Informtation?
Does anyone object to removing the information about camping reservations with phone numbers? I don't think this adds anything to the article. --Burntnickel (talk) 12:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). While federal government websites are public domain, this is not necessarily the case with state government websites, and this page bears a prominent copyright notice reserving rights. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Archive Pages
Is there any particular motivation to reference the archived web pages when the direct links seem to work just fine? --Burntnickel (talk) 14:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)