Talk:Battle of Arnhem/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Not reviewed yet - working on it  DB 103245 talk 18:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Fixed a couple of minor issues but on the whole, well written
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * seems to cover everything
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images tagged as free to use
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All looks fine to me - well done!
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All looks fine to me - well done!