Talk:Battle of Caulk's Field

Sir Peter Parker, 2nd Baronet
On the article for Sir Peter Parker, 2nd Baronet, it states that he died during this battle of bleeding from the femoral artery. However, on this article, it states that he was killed instantly of a head-shot. Could someone figure out which version of this is correct? Thanks. Lothar_von_Richthofen (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

This is obviously so balanced/sarcasm
Assumes British humiliation and that their accounts differ because of this, and are lying for this reason. Complete propaganda (this article). Can't just write they differed and the exact details are unknown for certain parts, have to side with the U.S. account?