Talk:Battle of Fariskur (1250)

Arabic names
Samsam, nice work on these crusade articles, but I am wondering if it is necessary to insert Arabic names into the text. Most people probably won't be able to read them anyway (even if they have the right fonts to see the text in the first place!). If we should keep them in, I think it would be better to separate them with brackets, rather than simply insert them in the middle of a sentence. Adam Bishop (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Adam Bishop, how are you i did not see you for a long time. I insert the names in Arabic because the names in English spelled often in different ways ( even sometimes wrong )thus I confirm the name and I think it might be usefull for those who can read Arabic. I understand your point. Let us think what to do. you think if we put arabic names between barkets is ok ? or maybe under notes ? let me know and maybe other people have other suggestion. anyway I wait for your suggestion and of others. Samsam22 (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've separated them with brackets for now, what do you think? Adam Bishop (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I think looks good. thnx Samsam22 (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Problems with ref
There are cases where text is surrounded by >ref< >/ref<  and therefore hidden. I fixed some. Others need to be fixed. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 01:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Historical consequence (sic!)
The section is filled with dates and events prior to 1250. Is this a misunderstanding of the word "consequence"? It seems to me that parts of the article need more careful attention to sequence of events.Vicedomino (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)