Talk:Battle of Groton Heights

== In this piece, as with most pieces about the U.S. War of Independence, there is not even a pretence of impartiality. British victories are bad, U.S. Victories are good. I suppose this is inevitable but to someone in the UK it still grates.

Sentence
"The state determined in 1792 that more than £61,000, or $200,000 Continental dollars." in Aftermath seems to be incomplete. I'm insufficiently aware of the background to help.-- 14:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for noticing; that somehow slipped my copyediting.  Magic ♪piano 15:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Battle of Groton Heights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721180705/http://www.fortgriswold.org/id9.html to http://www.fortgriswold.org/id9.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Introduction
I’ve amended the Introduction here per MOS:INTRO to reflect what the article actually says further down. The Battle section does not say "the Americans surrendered—whereupon the British entered the fort and massacred the defenders"; it says "Montgomery's men were finally able to open a gate from inside, and the British force poured into the fort. Seeing that the fort was penetrated, Colonel Ledyard ordered a cease fire and prepared to surrender it to the British", but then "the British continued to fire on the Americans despite Ledyard's signs of surrender". So they weren’t taken prisoner, then lined up and shot (like, say, at Malmedy), which is what the word "massacre", and the phrasing in the Introduction suggests; they were killed at the end of the action because the attackers ignored, or didn’t accept, their surrender (much like, for example, at the end of the beach scene in the film Saving Private Ryan). I would also note that: Regardless, MOS:INTRO states that the introduction should summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight, and be written with a neutral point of view, so that’s what has been done. Moonraker12 (talk) 20:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) in the Prelude section it says Eyre was threatening to give no quarter if the militia did not surrender;
 * 2) as well as 85 killed there were 60 wounded, which suggests the Brits didn’t go round afterwards finishing off anyone who was down but not out; and
 * 3) the British officer who killed Lelyard was then killed by a soldier named Lambo Latham, which suggests the fighting hadn’t ended at that point.

History of former slave, Jordan Freeman
If he was a former slave, there must be evidence that he was freed, and it should be reported. Is it only coincidental that his surname was "free man"? Can it be ruled out that he was recorded as "Jordan, free man" and this was not corrupted into Freeman? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Status of flag
Who said the flag had been shot away? Who raised it again? How quickly was it raised? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Saying the flag was "quickly re-raised" sounds suspiciously like an apologia to discount reports of Americans continuing to shoot British soldiers despite apparently having surrendered. If there is no further information, the sentence needs to be reworded. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Signs of surrender
“the British continued to fire on the Americans despite Ledyard's signs of surrender” Were the British firing or just using bayonets? More importantly, what were those signs of surrender since this suggests there was more than one. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 01:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Invalid Quotation of Rathbun/Avery
This quotation is actually from page 27 of Jonathan Rathbun’s book. It is found in the section "NARRATIVE OF RUFUS AVERY ". So these are not Rathbun’s words, unless he invented them and included them in Avery’s account.

The quotation begins "WE ARE INFORMED that the wretch who murdered him…" (my emphasis). So it is at least third hand. Aside from that, Avery supposedly says, "…[Ledyard] was about six feet from them when I turned my eyes off from him…” If this is true, he didn’t see what happened. Rathbun himself says nothing of the capture of the fort and the alleged massacre.

Since the quotation is out of context, is by a different person, and that person didn’t see what he describes, I have deleted it. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)