Talk:Battle of Hastings/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


 * So when did the English fleet disperse? On 8 September when Harold dismissed the local fyrd?
 * Yep. Clarified in the text. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Probably better rephrased as: likely "was not used" at Hastings, likely did not happen at Hastings
 * Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * on the Bretons division on Move link to first occurrence and add apostrophe for possessive.
 * Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * This is awkward: The duke then led a counter-attack against the pursuing English forces which were killed, with some of them rallying on a hillock before dying.
 * Changed to "The duke then led a counter-attack against the pursuing English forces, with some of them rallying on a hillock before dying." Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Typo: two brothers lead the pursuit
 * Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Missing possessive? Although Orderic Vitalis figures are highly exaggerated
 * Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Combine cites 41 and 42
 * I assume you meant 40 and 41? They are actually two different footnotes - one is just the footnote and the other is the page and the footnote. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Need ISBN for Howarth
 * Added. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Pics appropriately licensed.
 * External links good, no Dabs.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I've seen this - hoping to get to it tonight. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No rush.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, think I got them all. Let me know if you see anything else... Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)