Talk:Battle of Hochkirch/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:59, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * Austrian army of 80,000 "men" ?
 * Prussian army of 30,000–36,000 "men" ?
 * "Field" Marshal Leopold Josef Graf Daun fixed
 * What is the rank of Frederick the Great? King
 * Mention clearly in the lead that Austria has won the war They didn't win the war.
 * 7,300 men, 3 flags lost ; lost is redundant
 * Section 1;
 * Mention Leopold Josef Graf Daun along with his rank fixed
 * 80,000-man army -> army of 80,000 men why?
 * Mention Frederick's full name along with rank for first mention in prose (not considering the lead) fixed
 * Better abbreviate the units from second mention of the same units, for example, Kilometers, take care of this throughout the article fixed
 * In frustration; is a bit awkward fixed
 * Who is Wolf Frederick von Retzow? Mention his position and rank fixed
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 17:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Section 2;
 * Hochkirch stands on a hilltop -> Hochkirch is a located on a hilltop fixed
 * can be seen for miles? What does it mean? fixed
 * twenty-eight, - not required fixed
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 18:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Section 3;
 * The east side was the first to be attacked; east side of what? fixed
 * 0500 -> 5:00am per MOS:TIME
 * Marshal James Keith -> Keith, per MOS:LASTNAME fixed
 * 0600 -> 6:00am fixed 6:00
 * 0700 -> 7:00amfixed
 * rank of Francis of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel? Prince fixed
 * 0730 -> 7:30amfixed
 * 0900 -> 9:00amfixed
 * 1000 -> 10:00amfixed
 * Section 4;
 * approximately 8.3 percent, 3.6 percent; both these redundant, remove them
 * In the 4th para, the information on James Keith, about his sister, his grief etc. are out of context for the article. Cut short it.
 * shortened.


 * Section 5; all good
 * Images;
 * "Frederick lost approximately 30% of his army." in the caption of File:Frederick the Great after the Battle of Hochkirch in 1758 by Carl Röchling.jpg is unnecessary fixed
 * 4.8% confidence, violation unlikely
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)