Talk:Battle of Ismailia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is well written and follows the correct style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is well referenced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers the major events of the battle and is focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article follows a neutral point of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * The article does not appear to be affected by any edit warring.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are used well and freely licensed through public domain ruling.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Harrison49 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)