Talk:Battle of Kay/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * Link "Count" in "Count Pyotr Saltykov" done
 * Section 1;
 * Link Berlin done
 * Reword the complete last sentence as "Frederick tried to counter the Russian by sending an army corps, commanded by Friedrich August von Finck, and a second column commanded by Christoph II von Dohna", because the the King did not successfully counter the Russians, it was just an attempt done
 * Link Poznan done
 * frontier river Kwisa, or Queis -> frontier river Kwisa (German: Queis)
 * From there Count Leopold Joseph von Daun; just link the name, not along with the title done
 * north west toward -> north west towards toward is correct
 * commanded by András Hadik -> commanded by Count András Hadik
 * Section 2;
 * Link Empress Elizabeth done
 * but more realistic ones suggest; the word "realistic" is vague, you really don't know which figure is the real one. So better to reword deleting the word.done
 * Russians at down the next day; I think it is to be "dawn" not "down" done
 * Be consistent on using comma after mentioning the date. In some case (On 20 July Saltykov had moved.....) and in some (On 23 July, Wedel ordered a reconnaissance....). Both are acceptable formats but consistency is the key. Fix a format for the article.
 * Section 3; all good
 * Section 4;
 * In the second assault, Manteufel was injured; In the second para of the section 3; you said that he was injured in the initial attack, was he injured again? Did he not abandon after the first injury? make it clearer
 * Can the position of General Moritz Franz Kasimir von Wobersnow be obtained? I mean what he commanded etc. I don't think so.  I've not found it yet.
 * In the lead; it is mentioned that Russian losses were less than 5,000, what about "Russian losses at over 7,000" Frederick said losses at 7,000.
 * I suggest you to add the image of Pyotr Saltykov from his article done
 * 0% confidence, violation unlikely, well done.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)