Talk:Battle of Kliszów

Untitled
The text says both armies had about 20,000 soldiers. The template says the Swedish army had 12,000 and the Polish had 24,000. Which is correct? – Alensha    talk  14:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

name
Technically this should probably be under "Battle of Kliszów" per the usual naming conventions, although this is a minor point.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Kliszów seen to be more frequently used and is also the name for the battle in Swedish. If you're suggesting a move, I support it. Imonoz (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Draft:Battle of Kliszów into Battle of Kliszów
Draft has some information not in article. Draft and article should be compared. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Done.Alexander Alejandro (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Copy Editing
I've started reviewing and editing the article copy per Alexander Alejandro's request. Here are my notes so far:
 * Too much detail in intro? Per MOS, lead section for an article of this size should be one or two paragraphs
 * Flank vs wing? "Flank" sounds more appropriate when talking about maneuvers and locations, but under Line of Battle, "wing" seems more appropriate. Could use advice
 * Line of Battle better as a list? The Crown Army section is especially bad but the whole section seems unsuited for paragraph structure. Will review MOS
 * Is M in Field marshal capitalized? Likely, will confirm
 * Should Ryttmästare be italicized? Will review MOS
 * Is Cavalry General a title? Need to research

Exobiotic 💬 ✒️ 04:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)