Talk:Battle of Lade/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) Longdashes should not have any spaces between them. Any normal dashes (-) in the text should be replaced with longdashes (—).
 * Done


 * 1) There are a number of typos and other grammatical errors thoughout the prose. I recommend it recieve a copy-edit, preferably by a third party (but you could do this yourself as well).
 * Ah, yes. Whoops. I've gone through and removed everything I could find (including my shocking inability to type "contingent" properly).


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) "Herodotus gives the order of the Ionian battle line as being, from east to west; Miletus – Priene – Myus – Teos – Chios – Erythraea – Phocaea – Lesbos – Samos." -needs a ref.
 * Done


 * 1) The big quote in the "Prelude" section ""Men of Ionia, let each one of you now show..." needs a ref.
 * Done##Per WP:FOOT, the refs should be in the form of "Name, p. #" Some of them are in this format, but not all of them.
 * Done


 * 1) All of the refs need to be put into format.
 * Done


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold while a few stylistic issues are addressed. - Ed! (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. The article now meets the GA criteria, according to my interpretation of them. Well done! Ed! (talk) 13:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)