Talk:Battle of Liberty Place

Separate article for monument?
Especially given the recent debate over the monument's removal, I think it may be appropriate to have a separate article about the monument. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Another Believer: I agree. Can you please do it?Zigzig20s (talk) 04:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Feel free to take a look and make improvements to either article. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Assessed
Article assessed as Start-class. Large paragraphs of the article are missing citations these will need to be addressed in the future. Simultaneously fair portions of the article need to be reworked and restructured for grammatical issues and two to develop a standardization of writing, MOS will help. Mr rnddude (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just an example of the grammar issue; "The governor refused to meet and considered the committee as representing now armed masses a menace." took me twelve re-reads to figure it out, what it actually should say is, for example; The governor refused to meet the committee, considering the committee to be a menace for representing the now armed masses. Carry on, Mr rnddude (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Legal Procedings
This article has popups but also has a bit more info: http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/politics/article_db2818ac-045e-11e7-b65d-1311ddf0e635.html John5Russell3Finley (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Alternate Title? Current Title Euphemistic?
Shouldn't this article be called something like "1874 Louisiana Coup Attempt"? Is the current title and common name of "The Battle of Liberty Place" a neoconfederate euphemism?

IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 05:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Use of “terrorist”
Does the adjective “terrorist” add anything to “paramilitary”?

I note the contemporary Fenian Brotherhood is not called a terrorist paramilitary organization on this site but engaged in comparable actions. 134.41.86.115 (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)