Talk:Battle of Logorište/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 07:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

: A few very minor grammatical tweaks were made here and there. With that done, the article complies with policies on style, prose, and structure. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article makes frequent citations to a relatively vast collection of reputable sources. In terms of verifiability nothing seems left to chance. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: Looks as though all aspects of the subject for which relevant, encyclopedic information can be reliably provided have been covered in thorough. None of the information in the article appears irrelevant or excessive. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article discusses all aspects of the topic in a fair, neutral manner. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC) . The edit history shows that the article has scarcely been edited since last November, and no unconstructive edits seem to have been made amongst the revisions immediately shown, so I think the stability factor is in the clear. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC) : All three images used in the article are validly licensed, and play relevant illustrative roles. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading through the article and checking it against the outlined criteria above, I am confident that it is ready to be classified among the GAs of Wikipedia. Congratulations! :) As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)