Talk:Battle of Montlhéry

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 one external links on Battle of Montlhéry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111126224315/http://www.ucalgary.ca:80/applied_history/tutor/endmiddle/glossary/monagloss.html to http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/endmiddle/glossary/monagloss.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910191436/http://www.blackstudies.ucsb.edu/antillians/louisxi.html to http://www.blackstudies.ucsb.edu/antillians/louisxi.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308135614/http://www.teachingthinking.net/flowersinart/apollo.html to http://www.teachingthinking.net/flowersinart/apollo.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719071242/http://www.cehd.sga.defense.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Ca_23_Chap_5rimboud.pdf to http://www.cehd.sga.defense.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Ca_23_Chap_5rimboud.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901232806/http://warsoftheroses.devhub.com/blog/3216-pierre-de-breze-seneschal-of-normandy-c-14081465/ to http://warsoftheroses.devhub.com/blog/3216-pierre-de-breze-seneschal-of-normandy-c-14081465/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901232806/http://warsoftheroses.devhub.com/blog/3216-pierre-de-breze-seneschal-of-normandy-c-14081465/ to http://warsoftheroses.devhub.com/blog/3216-pierre-de-breze-seneschal-of-normandy-c-14081465/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Result of battle
At present, the lead and the article suggest that the battle was indecisive. The infobox has it as a French victory. The infobox should summarise the content of the article, rather than take an alternative position. Does anyone have sources to add to the article that supports the infobox version, or should the infobox be changed to indecisive? Monstrelet (talk) 13:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I had noticed this as well, some months back. Unfortunately I hadn't found the time to address this issue. If the article supports inconclusive then that's what should be in the infobox.--Kansas Bear (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * In the absence of comment to the contrary, I've made a change to indecisive and directed readers to the article text for further explanation. Monstrelet (talk) 16:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)