Talk:Battle of Ong Thanh/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Reasonably well written, I made a few minor copy-edits
 * Complies sufficiently with MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out, RS, no OR. However the ELs are used as references so should be removed as per WP:EL ✅
 * I have replaced the online sources with book references as per Wiki reference rules, which I wasn't aware of.Canpark (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough and focussed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Licensed and captioned
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one minor point, the ELs. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you again, mate.Canpark (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you again, mate.Canpark (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)