Talk:Battle of Osan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I was going to do a peer review, but then I saw this was at GA and decided to direct my comments there. I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "direct hits on the lead tanks, but did not damage the tanks." - repetition of tanks here that needs to be rephrased.
 * "Howitzer" is capitalised throughout, is this intentional.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * It would be nice to have a lead image, perhaps a map locating Osan on the Korean peninsula? On the same note, are co-ordinates available for the battle?
 * It would be nice to have a lead image, perhaps a map locating Osan on the Korean peninsula? On the same note, are co-ordinates available for the battle?


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)