Talk:Battle of P'ohang-dong/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 05:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
Looks good so far, some very minor points though:
 * All images have alt text and are appropriately tagged (no action required);
 * There are no external links (no action required);
 * There is one citation error - could be consolidated further as a named ref (I think you may have just missed one);
 * There is one dab link (to Carrier) - please rectify this;
 * I have made a few tweaks, please check they have not changed your intended meaning and that you are happy with them;
 * In the 'North Korean advance' section you use the phrases 'repeatedly pushing back' and then 'pushed back repeatedly'. This is a little repetitive (no pun intended) and should be reworded;
 * IMO the 'Forces Involved' heading should be renamed 'Prelude' in keeping with the layout stipulated in WP:MILMOS, so I changed it;
 * I think the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs in the 'UN Counteroffensive' section could probably merged (the 2nd para almost reads like the topic sentence etc of the 3rd, and is quite small so this could be done fairly easily);
 * Use of the word enemy should be avoided for POV (see first sentence in the 'UN forces pull back' section); and
 * In the 'Aftermath' section 'Many entire units were decimated in the fighting...' seems clumsy and should be re-worded. Anotherclown (talk) 06:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed all of the above. — Ed! (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Anotherclown (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed all of the issues. — Ed! (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Anotherclown (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed all of the issues. — Ed! (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Anotherclown (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed all of the issues. — Ed! (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Striking all issues now and passing. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)