Talk:Battle of Rhone Crossing

Consistency check
Most remarkable article. However it need a consistency check, especially of the formatting but also of some of the content - got the right persons for those equivocal Roman names? On the formatting, we need "cite" templates on those notes - dates - (give full cites) and Lazenby appears a few times with different ISBN's - needs systematization. Also I note there are no refs to primary sources. And, some of the refs are still in parenthetical form. The content looks good and there are some nice pics. Attention to these fine points makes the diff between a top article and a sloppy one. Time is not of the essence so take some.Dave (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Souldn't this be the Battle of The Rhone or the Battle of The Rhone Crossing?
Because the current title isn't grammatical in my dialect, and probably isn't grammatical in most dialects of English. 96.231.17.143 (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Referencing problems
, your recent edits introduced a couple dozen referencing errors to the article. I've fixed many, but I would appreciate your help in cleaning up the rest of the errors. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the assist. I have fixed the rest.Maglorbd (talk) 04:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Happy to help! :) There are still six more to fix. -- Mikeblas (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)