Talk:Battle of Schliengen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

review

 * The placement of some of the pictures leaves large patches of white spaces on my browser. This doesn't look nice. Can you improve?
 * I have no idea how to do this. Auntieruth55 (talk)
 * moved images. See if that's better. Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * actually no it didn't improve. I tried something using the FixBunching template. Now it looks good to me please check.
 * I don't see any difference, so I guess it worked. :)
 * "The mountains in the vicinity [of Mullhaus] are bold" I assume you mean Mulhouse?
 * Müllheim. ✅
 * The respective quote still mentions Mullhaus. So is it Mulhouse or Müllheim?
 * It is Müllheim,
 * "Sutzenkirchen"??? I couldn't find that place anywhere. There is a place called Sitzenkirch near Kandern which could be the place you refer to.
 * Yes. fixed.✅
 * I'm confused. You linked Sitzenkirchen while I still think Sitzenkirch is a better choice. done
 * "Feldberg", I linked Feldberg but it is ambiguous but I think it should be Feldberg, Baden-Württemberg, correct?
 * No, there is no article on the place. It's a fleck. I've added coordinates.✅
 * You state losses of 1,200 and 800 men respectively in the info-box. I can't find a citation for this information. The only reference to casualties is in the Aftermath section.
 * I'll add a cite.✅
 * Fix dashing on "The History of the campaign of 1796 in Germany and Italy, p. 122-23." and "The History of the campaign of 1796 in Germany and Italy, pp. 123–24." Notice the two types?
 * Yes, will fix. Thanks.✅  Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * "It was crossable only at certain places: Kehl, by Strasbourg, and Hüningen, by Basel, where systems of bridges and raised roads made access reliable." not cited
 * "(altitude 755 feet (230 m))" looks a bid odd with two closing brackets. Do you think it would look better with &mdash;(dash)ing? reworded to fix. Cite added  Auntieruth55 (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Pass Looks good to me now. Well done MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)