Talk:Battle of Snyder's Bluff/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Unlimitedlead (talk · contribs) 21:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Nice to work with you again. I can take this review on soon. Unlimitedlead (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Duplicate links: William T. Sherman; Chickasaw Bayou; John C. Pemberton
 * Fixed
 * Link American Civil War in the body?
 * Done
 * Ditto with Federal.
 * Done, although it's a bit of an awkward link to Union (American Civil War). "Union" was the historically prevalent turn, but the academic tide is turning against it's use.
 * And with Confederate States of America.
 * Done
 * And Mississippi River?
 * Done
 * "and contained 16 heavy cannon" Perhaps this is military talk, but is "cannons" not the right word to use here
 * Either way is considered acceptable, I believe
 * "Historians William L. Shea and Terrence J. Winschel..." False title?
 * Fixed
 * Just some minor quibbles to take care of and then this article should be set to become a GA. Unlimitedlead (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * - Thanks for the review! Replies above. Hog Farm Talk 02:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Another article well done! I will promote this article to GA status; I hope to see more quality content from you very soon. Unlimitedlead (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)