Talk:Battle of Tabu-dong/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Generally good prose. A couple instances of awkward speech, fixed those.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Battery of well formatted reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Very excellent work here again.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Cropped one of the maps
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well written article. Unequivocally passes GA criteria, but additional images, and improvement of prose would be required for FA. Also think expansion would be required.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well written article. Unequivocally passes GA criteria, but additional images, and improvement of prose would be required for FA. Also think expansion would be required.