Talk:Battle of the Assunpink Creek/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It seems to be very well organized and clearly written and referenced. I have noticed only a few small glitches listed in comments below. That's it!
 * Comments
 * As the British approached, Fermoy returned to Trenton, drunk. - I believe this is the only mention of Fermoy. He needs some identification as to his role.
 * One soldier said "the bridge looked red as blood, with their killed and wounded and their red coats. - there is no closing quotation mark.
 * I did a little copy editing and added the cite book format to one of your references.

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 19:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Done.-Kieran4 (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Very nice article. Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 21:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)