Talk:Baxstrom v. Herold

Wildly incorrect holding
I don't have time at the present to update the accuracy of this article, but it is wildly inaccurate. This case has absolutely nothing to do with the Double Jeopardy Clause, but instead it has to do with the Equal Protection Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment (see the ref in the article itself). Marking it as disputed for assistance. 2601:500:8300:399:5923:AC28:C08E:D09B (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)