Talk:Be More Chill

While this is very interesting, and the book was a good read, I'm not sure this is the place to advertise your research. And if it were, I would caution you to format your work better.

Edited
I have majorly edited this page, taking out the original research part and verifiying Ned Vizzini's comments with a link to his website, where he made them.

I am going to remove the warning header. If there are any further issues with this page, it can be tagged again. -Fisheromen 21:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I personally wonder if this is noteworthy enough for an article seperate from the book or the author. Comment? Chercher E. 19:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

You may be right, seeing as how the marketing campaign for this ended a while ago. Maybe it should be merged with the article on Ned Vizzini. --Fisheromen 00:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm personally in favor of that, but I'm relatively new, and don't know how to do such moves. Chercher E. 00:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Me neither. --Fisheromen 01:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC) So, should we call in someone smart? User Prodego has been fairly nice and helpful to me. You know anyone who can do these things? Chercher E. 19:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * What you are talking about isn't moving the page, but merging it. However, I am not sure we need an article on this at all, we don't have an article on the book, so it seems silly to have an article on something in the book. If you think this information is important enough for an article, an article should probably be made on the book, and this information put there. If you don't think this information needs an article, tag it as, and assuming no one removes the tag, it will be deleted by an administrator five days from now. If someone removes the tag, let me know, and I'll explain what that means (some info about this can be found here)  Prodego  talk  19:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Placing tag now. Chercher E. 19:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

hey, i was just wondering about one particular line: "Jeremy meets his best friend Michael Mell, who is as much of a dork as he is." but in the book, it says that because of Michael's headphones, he is able to be social with any of the cliques in the school. hmmmm... what do you think? even if he is a dork, he's not on the same level as jeremy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.230.231 (talk) 03:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Michael can sit with pretty much anyone he wants, and they ignore him because of his headphones. Not exactly social success. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.135.246 (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * That is not social success, however at one point Jeremy does say that Michael doesn't need a squip, because he at least has some chance/social skills. In the end, he is also able to get a girlfriend without a squip and interact socially at a party. I would agree that he is not on the same level as Jeremy is. 184.94.125.63 (talk) 07:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

i'm pretty sure nobody has really updated or looked at this page for a while now, but i'm going to suggest that we include the book cover(s) Xxriaa (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * yeah we should. also, perhaps somebody ought to monitor the page and make sure no musical fans add false facts ( like michaels moms ) to the book page

Applejuiceandpeachh (talk) 03:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)