Talk:Bean Station, Tennessee/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

'''Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article.  -- Instructions:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment



Observations
HTML document size: 276 kB   Prose size (including all HTML code): 40 kB    References (including all HTML code): 120 kB    Wiki text: 62 kB    Prose size (text only): 22 kB (3551 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 15 kB


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Article is well laid out; Infobox is quite the informative data


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The Lede is a little bit lean and sparse, given the history of this location. ✅
 * Reference 3 is dead; it is on the Archive.org site. ✅
 * Reference 8 is a dead link and indicates new data will be available anon; ✅
 * Reference 12 is a most interesting read.
 * Demographics - is the 2010 Census the latest information available?


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I am surprised that the construction of the Cherokee Dam - where 87% of the existing population were forced to move by way of eminent domain, is not mentioned in the Lede. ✅


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV is preserved in this article.


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created 23 May 2005
 * Page has 657 edits from 153 editors
 * 90 day page views = 5,534 with an average of 59 reads per day
 * Internet Archive bot has visited 2 times
 * GreenC bot has been on the page 6 times (repairing archive links)
 * Page received 350 edits in 2020 ...


 * Page history shows steady improvement; page considered stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:Main Street West - Bean Station.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * File:Bean StationTNSeal.png = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bean_Station,_Tennessee#/map/0 = Wikimedia Maps, Open Street Map
 * File:USA Tennessee location map.svg = Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
 * File:Street intersection - NARA - 281459 (colorized).jpg = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
 * File:Old Bean Station Inn = Public domain,  Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
 * File:Peavine Railroad trestle bridge.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * File:View of town - NARA - 280421 cropped cleaned colorized.jpg = Public domain,  Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
 * File:Old Bean Station site 2021.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
 * File:Bean Station municipal limit signage.jpg = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
 * File:East Tennessee Crossing - Battle of Bean Station Re-enactment - NARA - 7718106.jpg = Public domain, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
 * Images all appropriately licensed and tagged.


 * 1) Notifying Editors:
 * Page Creator HollyAm (has not contributed since October 2013)
 * Editor AppalachianCentrist
 * Editor Magnolia677
 * Editor ACase0000
 * Editor BrineStans
 * Editor Bneu2013
 * Editor Fettlemap
 * A total of six involved editors were able to be notified.


 * 1) Overall:
 * Quite an interesting history of Bean station, well written and well laid out, although the Lede is a little spare.
 * This reassessment has been occasioned by a 'drive by' GA review; the article is likely to keep this status if we can attend to the minor issues raised above. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you and  for your work on this article. The lede looks far more robust, the demographics have been updated, which is really good. Ditto dead links. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)