Talk:Bear Grylls/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 21:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

This is a very premature nomination. The lead does not provide an adequate summary about the subject for one. Prose is jumpy. The format of references is inconsistent; what makes this a reliable source? Incidentally a good article should not have dead links and 'citation needed' tags.

The bottom line is this does not meet the good article criteria so I am failing this. I suggest you take this to WP:PR for more detailed feedback and ways to expand the article properly.