Talk:Beat the Chefs/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 07:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Nicely done with no real issues. On hold for 14 days. 23W 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Link to Jeff Henderson?
 * Also pipe to The About Group in the reception section.
 * Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the Phoenix New Times, another from the South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Link to Jeff Henderson?
 * Also pipe to The About Group in the reception section.
 * Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the Phoenix New Times, another from the South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun.
 * Also pipe to The About Group in the reception section.
 * Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the Phoenix New Times, another from the South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun.
 * Thanks again. I have no idea how you found those sources; perhaps they'll come in handy while I copyedit. As my user page says, this is a CRAZY week for me. Even still, I am planning on getting up early tomorrow to get a jump on some real life work, so perhaps I'll take care of these then, but it'll probably end up waiting until the weekend. Again, much thanks! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 03:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No prob; take your time. 23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I figured since I was up until 11:30 already doing homework, I might as well knock this out. Hopefully it is ✅! Also, I still can't make many promises as to when I'll have time, but I'll see if I can review one of your nominations at some point. Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review Lucas Bros. Moving Co., that would be great. 23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I was actually looking at Dan Deacon: U.S.A. since I've already reviewed Off the Air (TV series), but if you'd rather me take a look at Lucas Bros. Moving Co., I can do that as well. Thanks again for your review, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)