Talk:Beatrice, Countess of Arundel

Request Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

eatrice, Countess of Arundel}}

Infanta Beatrice, Countess of Arundel → Beatrice, Countess of Arundel — She was a natural daughter of John I, so she could not have been an Infanta (Princess).--Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy (talk) 00:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, even if she was an Infanta there'd be no need to mix it up with the English title.--Kotniski (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Death date
has provided a source for a 1447 death date, but the URL mentioned in the edit summary shows that this date is for the other Beatrice, the one linked with the Fettiplace family. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

??? The Beatrice shown as dying 1447 is the other Beatrice, yes. Precisely. That's why I changed to the 1439 date. Frankly, I'm still not fully certain of the death dates, but you seem to argue here only that since the other Beatrice died 1447, this one did too! Jamesdowallen (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I messed this up. I only started to poke around here when I saw the disagreement between the birth year in the article text and the one in the category list. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm still uncertain but I got the 1439 date from http://www.genealogics.org a reputable website subject to scrutiny by many medieval genealogists. Jamesdowallen (talk) 08:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)