Talk:Beatrice Masilingi

As on the Christine Mboma article, I don't understand the statement that "WA has error and can't write legal English" in reverting the addition of Mboma's coverage by WA's DSD regulations, which accurately described the provided sources. If you mean that the Namibian Federation disputes WA's actions, then this should be included in addition to WA's judgment. Since WA is the international governing body for athletics that determines athlete eligibility, its regulations and its ruling on this matter is significant, whatever they may be. Fiwec81618 (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * 1st. Please, check general rules here (by ): GD_talk (lede rules). 2nd. Please, understand. I am 3 levels above "easy problems and disputes". I do not question actions of Athletics Namibia or WA's actions, and "we all" know which body manages here. However, we talk about confidential medical record details here. WA made badly written FAQ for uneducated people but check their main pdf attachment for details. So, please, be careful what you write about DSD. In the attachment, a lawyer had no typical problem of and/or combination so it would be best to link to it. Also, there are at least three others athletes in this situation, you can check their articles too - it is written better there. Jgwikid (talk) 22:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The edits you reverted do not contain confidential medical information. I am not in possession of confidential medical information regarding these athletes and I am not aware of any sources that have published such information either. Those reverted edits simply contained the factual (and sourced) statement that Mboma/Masilingi were barred from competition in select events due to WA regulations which are then elaborated on. I basically transcribed text contained in the relevant sources and have not added anything original, so I'm not sure what "be careful what you write about DSD" can mean other than that you take issue with a particular source (from WA itself) which describes those regulations, and that you don't think information from this source should be used. Possibly regarding this, you say that "WA made badly written FAQ for uneducated people but check their main pdf attachment for details" — I agree the pdf should be included, but as with your previous comment that "WA has error and can't write legal English," I do not see on what basis the claim "WA made badly written FAQ for uneducated people" is made. In any case the current Christine Mboma article does seem to address this well after subsequent contributions from other editors and these changes can be brought into the Beatrice Masilingi article too. Fiwec81618 (talk) 22:56, 8 August 2021 (UTC)