Talk:Beaverton Transit Center/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 20:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Opening review Kingsif (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Style
 * Lead might be a little long for the article
 * Perhaps some of the location/busy statistics info (last three sentences of first paragraph) could get their own body section? (Though there seems to be some duplication in Station details and Services already) - Lead only really needs to say it's the busiest
 * I have shortened it. --Truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Lead well-written
 * Generally well-written throughout
 * Seriously, I can't even find a comma to fix
 * Needs attention


 * Coverage
 * Is it possible to get some prose on the bus services? If there's nothing on them, the detailed list is fine.
 * Done. --Truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Detailed but concise, with good phrasing, throughout
 * Unless there's any future plans hiding, looks good
 * Pass


 * Illustration
 * Infobox good
 * Good use of image in history
 * And of platform
 * Platform diagram - question about the door sides, though, because the Red line/island platform/left doesn't seem to work, nor WES/side/left or right
 * Corrected. --Truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think the bus station needs two image, especially since the relevant section is too small to hold either and they've been put next to rail services
 * I think I would prefer to keep it, if that's okay. It's a nice image. And demonstrates the station's design well. --Truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Needs attention


 * Stability
 * History good
 * Talk page shows no disputes
 * Pass


 * Neutrality
 * All good
 * Pass


 * Verifiability
 * All sources look good, but are there no links to the older The Oregonian articles? Even a scan archive somewhere online?
 * Everything cited, down to pages
 * Pass


 * Copyright
 * earwig check worked and is clear.
 * Images all free and licensed
 * Pass

on hold Just a few things, but a good looking article Kingsif (talk) 20:59, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Overall
 * Thank you so much for taking this one! It's been pending for a while now, so I really appreciate it. Please let me know if I could address anything else. Thanks, again. --Truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It's a nice article! Maybe move one of those bus images down, but it's not too image-heavy so I don't mind them staying. Symbol support vote.svg Kingsif (talk) 21:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)