Talk:Beazley Medal

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 one external links on Beazley Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525081253/http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Lists/Statements/DispForm.aspx?ID=115001 to http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Lists/Statements/DispForm.aspx?ID=115001
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/states-top-students-shine-20090104-79p7.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/calum-braham-is-was-top-student-and-beazley-medal-winner/story-e6frg13u-1226238254089?nk=6825817ff792b111bb4af2231395ff24-1451634738
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/female-students-katie-dyer-and-madisen-scott-shine-in-beazley-medal-honours/story-e6frg13u-1226547707586?nk=10da50fe2bbb75fe40a2ee9fa3870f4b-1451634309
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-03/beazley-medal-winner/5183882
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-01-02/beazley-medal-winners-announced-in-wa/5997426
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-31/hard-work-pays-off-for-beazley-medal-winners/7061910

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Beazley Medal
Hi everyone,

Evaluating the article "Beazley Medal."

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There is nothing that distracted me from reading it.

None of the information is out of data, and the article does not seem to be missing anything that could be added.

I would criticize the fact that the article does not have pictures of the previous winners.

The tone was neutral, and none of the claims are biased.

No, I think the author(s) of the article represented it clearly and concisely.

The links do work, and the sources support the claims in the article.

Each fact is cited correctly, and the information comes from neutral sources.

On the talk page, there are conversations going on about how to represent this topic and the last edit was made on december 17, 2018.

The article is not rated and it is not apart of any WiKiProkects.

Wikipedia does not discuss the topic any differently than we would in class.

FatCookies123 (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Michael Del Grosso