Talk:Bedford Free School

Neutrality
The article as it stands strikes me as rather one sided in favour of the school and contains no reference to real criticism. I considered tagging as a COI as well, particularly as the two major contributors haven't edited really outside of this article. Certainly there's a need for citing specific POV issues and, probably, inserting some kind of balance into the article. I'll see what I can find, but it'd be lovely if people with access to local press archives could do so as well. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have attempted to address this by updating the article, and adding the council's reasons for refusing planning permission. It still needs work though. Bleaney (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, I can't really see anything wrong with the neutrality of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.241.9 (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reordered the article, added recent information about the schools ofsted inspection, and added a section to the lead that explains the controversy surrounding the school. I have removed the POV template as I now think the article reflects the 'for' and 'against' arguments more fairly, however please feel free to readd the template if you think its not the case. - Bleaney (talk) 13:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bedford Free School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426011857/http://www.bedfordfreeschool.co.uk/pdf/bedford-free-school-guide.pdf to http://www.bedfordfreeschool.co.uk/pdf/bedford-free-school-guide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)