Talk:Beechwood House, Highgate/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 17:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I will take this one on. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Review:

Additional Comments:
 * I am using the GA criteria, as well as these articles - Beaumont House, Camak House and Cushing House to use as a reference.TheMagikCow (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Missing elements:
 * The Historic England reference makes mention of how it is Grade II listed, but there is no such mention in the text. This is a notable - even lead - worthy fact. You may also be able to pull up some more listed building related sources. Camak House has a great section on historic status.
 * There is still not enough information of what this means and the implications of being listed. TheMagikCow (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The lead is slightly underdeveloped. See the three examples put - some sections to add would be about the style and status. WP:MOSLEAD has some great ideas too.
 * The last paragraph described the planning applications, but does not give a result. This is important information. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Although not essential, an infobox, probably the {historic site} one, will be very favourable. Per WP:INFOBOXUSE, they are neither required nor prohibited, but I feel that to achieve the comprehensive status that the GAC places, and infobox would be desirable. TheMagikCow (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have done this for you. TheMagikCow (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Although not essential, an infobox, probably the {historic site} one, will be very favourable. Per WP:INFOBOXUSE, they are neither required nor prohibited, but I feel that to achieve the comprehensive status that the GAC places, and infobox would be desirable. TheMagikCow (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have done this for you. TheMagikCow (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have done this for you. TheMagikCow (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

I will place this on hold for 7 days, and will see if these comments are addressed. If they are done sooner, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page, and I will gladly have another look over. TheMagikCow (talk) 11:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

I am closing this now as these comments have not been addressed in over 7 days. Feel free to sort these out and then renominate - give me a  and I will sure have a look! TheMagikCow (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)