Talk:Beefmaster (tomato)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (it is a very notable species of tomato, message me on my talk page so I know i'm not talking to a bot) --Tomato expert1 (talk) 02:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * this species is already discussed at Beefsteak tomato, and btw bot can also place messages on talk pages.--Vigyani (talk) 02:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, sorry about that. Why are you saying that this article is a copy of beefsteak tomato? The pages look very different & they are a different type of tomatoes. Do you need any clarification on the tomatoes? Or are you just saying it looks like I copied the beefsteak article, which is a stub? Tomato expert1 (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I just checked and the article "Beefsteak tomato" has only a 4-word description. This tomato has notable history beyond the species which it was bred from, not to mention how huge these giant tomatoes get (about twice as big as a beefsteak if you prune the suckers off). Tomato expert1 (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * if you think they are different, then provide some reliable references, especially stressing that beafmaster and beafsteak are different and wait for an admin to take a decision. do not remove the tag yourself. --Vigyani (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Nah, you win, you can keep the 4-word description & have a nice day. I don't want to fight with a tomato amateur who is an internet bully. To me, it is no different dealing with a power-tripping wikipedia editor than it is having to deal with a troll. Both of them can equally ruin my good day if I choose to give them any attention. I have removed this page from my watchlist and made the redirect into beefsteak tomato where people wishing to learn more about this variety (which according to amateurs is no different than a beefsteak tomato) can get an enlightening 4-word description! Tomato expert1 (talk) 02:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)