Talk:Beelzebub in culture

I reverted changes as a result between a childish editing war between two abusive users. The two users try both to dominate the article, and this is not something that belongs on Wikipedia.

One user claims familiarity to the article, while the other claims authority. I don't think this should be viewed as anything more than petty argument between two overgrown children.

Also, one of the users claim that "?? in culture" is not an appropriate way to name articles, while it is not user consensus on how an article should be named. Nor does that use of redirects solve that problem. There are, as well, other articles that are named "?? in culture" in regard to a general way of naming these sort of articles. These, including this article, are not so-called "main articles", nor disambiguation pages. Jagganath 20:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but your blind revert is actually the childish edit from an abusive editor... This article title is absoilutely not accurate, furthermore, it is a completely unnecessary WP:FORK file, in violation of WIkipedia policies, because the article already has a section on this. Satanael decided that instead of editing out nonencyclopedic references that he'd expand them into a new article under a really bad title. See WP:ENC for removing of nonencyclopedic references.


 * It'd be one thing if you were trying to come to a rational conclusion here, but all you are doing is blind reverting the page yourself and making personal attacks in the process. That's not how Wikipedia is supposed to work either. DreamGuy 13:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)