Talk:Bees Saal Baad (1962 film)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bees Saal Baad (1962 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120922021831/http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=168&catName=MTk2Mg%3D%3D to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=168&catName=MTk2Mg%3D%3D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 30 January 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved - consensus against (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 03:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

– A simple Google Books search yields all the initial results to the more popular and rewarded 1962 film, clearly indicating that this is the primary topic and not the 1988 film.  Oracle  of   Delhi  14:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Bees Saal Baad (1962 film) → Bees Saal Baad
 * Bees Saal Baad → Bees Saal Baad (disambiguation)
 * Obvious oppose per |Bees_Saal_Baad_(1988_film)|Bees_Saal_Baad PageViews. --Gonnym (talk) 15:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose as above--pageviews indicate the 1988 film is more frequently visited; google books suggest the 1962 film is more widely written about. As such it makes sense to keep the unadorned title as a disambig page to split the difference. G RAPPLE   X  15:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment @Gonnym @Grapple X Was just wondering what about the other way around? Move the 1988 film to the title without the disambiguator, keep the 1962 film as it is and delete the disambiguation page. I have absolutely no issues with that. It just doesn't make much sense to me to keep a separate disambiguation page with only two pages listed when that purpose could be easily served by hatnotes.  Oracle  of   Delhi  16:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The problem is that there's no clear primary topic; you could pick a metric to favour either one in that regard. Without a clear primary topic the current situation remains the cleanest solution. G RAPPLE   X  16:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.