Talk:Before Mario

Tagged for not being neutral
While I think the book is notable, and the sources show significant coverage of the book, I have noticed that there's a lack of criticism of the book within the article. This is why I tagged that for NPOV.  Mario Jump  83!  05:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm the page creator, so I'm a bit biased, but I disagree. The reception section covers both positives and criticisms critics had with the book. I do agree that the opening paragraph in the rec. section could be expanded with criticisms, but I don't think that qualifies as a big enough reason to dispute its neutrality. If you have any other reason to dispute the neutrality, please let me know so I can work on it. Cheers, IanTEB (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Mario Jump  83!  06:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)