Talk:Behance

Recent major revision
I did a major revision to remove the SEO/advert nature of the page. Still I am not sure the page should exist, so please see the deletion discussion. I'm skeptical about Behance since reading and editing the old article. A couple pointers:


 * Avoid first-hand source, like Behance/99U itself. The previous article was 99% (har har) first-hand stuff.
 * The Webby's are a controversial pay-to-be-nominated award designed to advertise sites. 20% of entrants always become "finalists". We shouldn't list every nomination or finalist position.
 * Intricate details about basic features don't seem appropriate for an article about a company.

--OKNoah (talk) 23:27, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Behance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120126031720/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=15 to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=15
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120126031720/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=15 to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=15

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Other uses
Google is using Behance to creep up on job applicants via Hire with Google ATS:

Research candidates automatically with Google Search         Google Search provides more background on a candidate by automatically surfacing links to their profiles from sites like LinkedIn®, GitHub, Behance, Stack Overflow, US Patent Database, and others...

Let us add it here.

I smell an ad ...
The entire text barely avoids the "we" as it says "they" ... in other words I do not perceive it as a neutral description done by a 3rd party but rather as an advertisement. Just the extreme and confusing list of former clients right at the beginning - impossible from my POV. Instead of that list it would have been more helpful to read about what it really is, what sets it apart and some basic historical information. Yes, it says its a social network ... just to continue to say that LinkedIn was a client. But LinkedIn is a major social network itself ... Sorry, not satisfied at all. JB. --92.193.163.13 (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)