Talk:Behistun Palace

A stub or not a stub, to merge or not to merge
First of all, it seems that because of the length of this article, people keep removing a stub tag from it. However, if you read the article, you'll see why it is a stub: length of text does not equal encyclopedic-quality research, much less writing.

Also, while trying to figure out why an earlier version of this article had the Infobox World Heritage Site removed, I found the Behistun Inscription article. As I understand it (and frankly I'm limited by illness so I might be wrong; I usually cannot offer more than suggestions while I browse and then move on), this article is based on theories that have yet to be proven.

I suggest one of the following: Argh! I had a third suggestion, but it vanished from my head. Anyway, sorry this is all I can do. I'm cross-posting this to the more active Behistun Inscription's talk page.
 * 1) Merge Behistun Palace article into Behistun Inscription as a section.
 * 2) Keep the separate article but break it down into sub-topics where research is needed. Move those to the Behistun Palace talk page in separate sections to encourage research and prevent wholesale reversions. Keep a summary on the front page along with a stub tag or two.

Thanks, --Geekdiva (talk) 07:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorted I hope