Talk:Behsudi (Hazara tribe)

Besudh Vs Behsud
The article should be moved to Behsud because the correct spell of the tribe name is so. Usually in Afghanistan tribes are named as their village/town or vice versa. Hazara Birar (Talk) 11:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅:: Moved the article, just to be more specific, to Behsud (Hazara tribe). Hazara Birar (Talk) 06:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Propaganda!
"One could rely these on the emergence of identity by Hazaras themselves, which was pressed, and lost since the late 1800s, after the Holocaust and oppression by the Pashtun rulers. The ownership of the land, or in softer tones the nativity of Hazaras can easily be seen in the remains of old empires, artifacts, the names of the cities and mountains. As Afghanistan in the pre-Holocaust era, which cost 64% of Hazara population, was heavily populated by Hazaras. Hazaras & Tajiks share thousands' of years of history, & are the oldest major tribes in then called Khorasan (The land that sun rises). Due to the fact that Hazaras are Turkic tribes, & they were the majority of the country, & mostly were the ruling class, to identify the 2nd largest tribe within their empire, naming non-Turks "Tajik" arose as a result. For Hazaras & Tajiks sharing such long history side by side. Third and the scientific DNA results conducted by Natgeo on Hazaras of Quetta, clearly shows that the Hazaras has a majority Mongol DNA.It was the emergence of Pashtuns, a nomadic tribe from then Indian sub-continent in the early 1700, which changed the destiny of Khorasan slowly & surely. This can be touched more in depth in other topics."

I'm lucky i just encountered this unsourced garbage on this article. Not only is it racist to a particular ethnic group, its talking about an event that never took place and even goes off topic multiple times such as Hazara's being Turkic etc. Hazara's are Mongols not Turks and it mentions a non-existence DNA study that's not even listed. This is all going to be removed. Akmal94 (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)