Talk:Belarusian Orthodox Church

Criticism
The first paragraph of the criticism/controversies section uses a primary source of an organization that has next to no recognition and also no authority in the country. At least a secondary source should be used here. See WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. The rest of the section looks like original research. For example using this for claims of promoting Russian irredentism (in Wikivoice!), which is literally based on a photo which mentions "Holy Rus". Also due to WP:CSECTION, such a section should generally be avoided but this just looks like a POV edit. Mellk (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)