Talk:Belgian government in exile

Composition/ministers
Does anyone know where this list is from? I've found a couple of minor inaccuracies, but I cannot find a comparable list in any of the material I've looked at... Also, any idea what date the table shows the government at? --Brigade Piron (talk) 10:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Infobox
I've just removed the infobox from the article. This isn't just some page-ownership vendetta (please be assured ;) - it's just that it when I wrote the GA, I deliberately avoided using one, mostly because:


 * 1) The Belgian government in exile is not just a simple cabinet. The article certainly covers what is generally termed the Pierlot IV government (Oct '40-Sept '44), but can refer to several Belgian governments (including the "July Government" from May-Oct '44) in exile during WWII. This complexity is lost in the confined nature of an infobox. Basically, it's a long process of evolving cabinets that get lumped together because they often have the same Prime Minister. To be honest, the Pierlot III cabinet has more in common with the Pierlot IV government of 1941 than than the early P. IV government has with its 1944 reality...
 * 2) There are all sorts of ambiguities (Leopold III isn't really the head of state at the time, having been declared incompetent to reign  for instance) There just isn't really any useful info that can go in the box, so doesn't really meet the criteria of Manual of Style/Infoboxes

Brigade Piron (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Former Country infoboxes are standard for historic Governments in Exile. While I can understand the lack of an infobox for the World War I Beligian government, as the country was never completely occupied and the King remained on the front lines at Yser, World War II saw the complete occupation of the country. It was more than just a government in exile, as well, as it governed the Belgian Congo, the way Free France governed some French territories. I see no reason why this article shouldn’t follow standard procedure for articles relating to governments-in-exile, especially internationally recognized governments-in-exile of World War II. Anasaitis (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 * For reference, it would be nice to get a consensus here per WP:BRD before adding the infobox which you have attempted multiple times. Your argument about the legitimacy of the government is pretty normative. A government is still a government, whatever it controls - though I admit you might have a better argument on Free France which, rightly or not, self-consciously framed itself as a polity. This is not relevant here. Your second argument about this being standard on government-in-exile pages is blatantly wrong, as Talk:Yugoslav government-in-exile makes clear. If any other articles have one, past experience would suggest it is because you added it! —Brigade Piron (talk) 13:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

I am not single handedly adding all the infoboxes to these pages. I do not appreciate your accusations. Your argument that “a government is still a government, whatever it controls” could be used to argue against infoboxes for ANY government, regardless of whether it is in exile or not. The fact that it actually controlled territory makes it more than “just a government” in the same manner as Free France was more than just a government. Anasaitis (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Government-in-exile
I feel that the article should be Belgian government-in-exile rather than Belgian government in exile because look at these:
 * Czechoslovak government-in-exile
 * Dutch government-in-exile
 * Greek government-in-exile
 * Luxembourg government-in-exile
 * Polish government-in-exile
 * Yugoslav government-in-exile

They all have hypens between government-in-exile. Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The phrase is an official and formal title so you are correct. Perhaps someone will rename/move it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.135.170 (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Actually all the others are wrong. A decent description of why is here (p.16). Grammatically a "government-in-exile" only makes sense if there is another recognised government (not in exile) to distinguish it from - here there is not, so it is simply a "government in exile". There is no other grammatical reason for which th hyphenation would be necessary (though it would correctly be "in-exile government"). Would you move government in exile to government-in-exile too? —Brigade Piron (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belgian government in exile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130521023602/http://www.winstonchurchill.org/support/the-churchill-centre/publications/finest-hour/issues-109-to-144/no-138/898-feeding-the-crocodile-was-leopold-guilty to http://www.winstonchurchill.org/support/the-churchill-centre/publications/finest-hour/issues-109-to-144/no-138/898-feeding-the-crocodile-was-leopold-guilty

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)